IRS Releases Final Rules Applying Section 108(e)(8) COD Income to Partners and Partnerships

On Nov. 15, 2011 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released guidance on the application of the Section 108(e)(8) to cancellation of indebtedness (COD) income of partners and partnerships (the “Guidance”). See T.D. 9557. The new rules are effective Nov. 17, 2011.

Generally, Section 108(e)(8) provides that when a partnership transfers a capital or profits interest to a creditor in satisfaction of the partnership’s indebtedness, the partnership will be treated as having satisfied the indebtedness with cash of a value equal to the fair market value of the partnership interest transferred to such creditor. COD income exists if the value of the partnership interest transferred is less than the indebtedness cancelled. COD income realized on such a transfer, if any, is allocated to the partners of the partnership based on their distributive shares immediately before such cancellation. The Guidance clarifies that the value of partnership interest transferred is equal to the liquidation value of such interest so long as – (1) all parties involved in the exchange (i.e. the creditor, debtor, partnership etc) consistently treat the value as being the liquidation value; (2) the partnership uses a consistent valuation methodology in all debt for equity exchange that are part of the same transaction; (3) the debt for equity exchange is made at arm’s length (can be satisfied even if the parties are related); and (4) following the debt for equity exchange, neither the partnership nor any related person purchases the partnership interest as a part of a plan that existed as of the time of the debt for equity exchange in a transaction that’s principal purpose is the avoidance of COD income.

The Guidance also address the application of Internal Revenue Code Section 721 relating to a creditor’s contribution of a recourse or nonrecourse indebtedness to a partnership in exchange for a capital or profits interest. Generally, the nonrecognition rule of Section 721 applies in a debt for equity exchange and the creditor will not recognize a loss or bad debt deduction in such an exchange. The creditor’s basis in the partnership interest received is increased by the adjusted basis of the indebtedness. Ordinary income items, such as rent, royalties and interest cannot, however, be cancelled in a nonrecognition transaction under Section 721, unless such obligations arose before the beginning of the creditor’s holding period for the indebtedness.

Finally, the Guidance address how to allocate income arising from a partnership’s discharge of indebtedness as a minimum gain chargeback. The Guidance provides that COD income arising in the discharge of a partnership or partner nonrecourse indebtedness is treated as a first-tier item for minimum gain chargeback purposes.

The Guidance and new regulations will contain a few examples to demonstration application of these rules.

Disclaimer: This blog and website are public sources of general information concerning our firm and its lawyers, as well as the information presented. They are intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date as of the date posted. This blog and website are not intended to be, and are not, sources of legal opinion or advice. The materials, information, and communications on this blog and website do not apply to any particular person, entity, or situation, and do not apply to you or to your specific situation. You will need to consult with an attorney and/or other appropriate professional about your specific situation. Thank you.
Roger Royse
rroyse@rroyselaw.com

Roger Royse, the founder of the Royse Law Firm, works with companies ranging from newly formed tech startups to publicly traded multinationals in a variety of industries. Roger regularly advises on complex tax structuring, high stakes business negotiations and large international financial transactions. Practicing business and tax law since 1984, Roger’s background includes work with prominent San Francisco Bay area law firms, as well as Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy in New York City. Read My Full Bio

X