Flipping the Charge: Determining the Costs of Attorneys

Flipping the Charge: Determining the Costs of Attorneys

The price of attorneys and determining who pays them are important issues in trust disputes. When a beneficiary brings a lawsuit against a trust or trustee, the beneficiary needs to be aware that, in some circumstances, the trust’s costs of the suit might be chargeable against the beneficiary.

If a beneficiary’s suit is determined baseless and without merit, or in bad faith, courts have determined that attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the trust can be charged against the beneficiary’s share of the trust assets.  This can happen even though attorneys’ fees and costs from these types of disputes have not typically been charged against the beneficiary’s personal non-trust assets. Similarly, even though the standard is that a trustee’s attorneys is paid by the trust, in a case where a trustee brings a lawsuit with an unjustified position, the trustee can also be required to pay his or her own attorneys’ fees and costs, rather than having them paid by the trust.

In a recent case, Pizarro v. Reynoso, the court expanded its authority to charge the beneficiary’s share of the trust.  In Pizarro, the court held that the trust’s attorneys’ fees and costs can be charged against the trust share of the beneficiary even when the beneficiary had not filed or brought the lawsuit.  In Pizarro, the beneficiary initially agreed with the trustee. However, during the suit, the beneficiary changed to a position against the trustee and offered false testimony.  The court held that this was an act of bad faith by the beneficiary, thus causing the trust to incur further monetary losses. The court held that offering false evidence in litigation is a bad faith litigation tactic.

You can find a more formal summary of Pizarro v. Reynoso here.

Trust disputes require careful evaluation regarding an attorneys’ fees and costs, who pays them, and how they are charged. If you are involved in a contentious trust or estate administration or litigation, please contact our experienced attorneys for the advice you need.

Disclaimer: This blog and website are public sources of general information concerning our firm and its lawyers, as well as the information presented. They are intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date as of the date posted. This blog and website are not intended to be, and are not, sources of legal opinion or advice. The materials, information, and communications on this blog and website do not apply to any particular person, entity, or situation, and do not apply to you or to your specific situation. You will need to consult with an attorney and/or other appropriate professional about your specific situation. Thank you.
Tags:
David Tate
dtate@rroyselaw.com

David is an experienced civil and probate court litigation attorney. David’s civil litigation cases primarily involve business, real estate, commercial, D&O, environmental, products liability, IP, employment, insurance coverage and bad faith, professional liability (trustee, real estate broker, insurance broker, accountant, D&O), and personal injury litigation.
Read My Full Bio | Contact Me

X